Jump to content
IGNORED

2016 Flashback speculation thread


Recommended Posts

I assume that it would've increased their cost, but too bad that some of the original games weren't sacrificed in order to accommodate the genuine Sega efforts that were left off.

 

I think it's quite clear that half of this lineup has always been fluff to pad the game count, although I suppose someone somewhere really enjoys a game or two out of that group. So ideally, any sacrifices should've came from those games.

 

Either way, nice to see save support introduced. Now just fix the audio with next year's hardware and things will be looking pretty good, with HDMI about the last hurdle that needs to be taken care of.

Edited by Atariboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We'll still have the Atari Flashback Portable. That's something!

I plan on getting the Atari portable. :grin:

 

I assume that it would've increased their cost, but too bad that some of the original games weren't sacrificed in order to accommodate the original Sega efforts that were left off.

 

I think it's quite clear that half of this lineup has always been fluff to pad the game count, although I suppose someone somewhere really enjoys a game or two out of that group. So ideally, any sacrifices should've came from those games.

 

Either way, nice to see save support introduced. Now just fix the audio with next year's hardware and things will be looking pretty good, with HDMI about the last hurdle that needs to be taken care of.

I imagine if it 60-100 Genesis games were cheap and readily available to license as is the case with the Atari Flashbacks, they would have included them. The "fluff" you describe is padding to make the Genesis Atgames consoles look more impressive compared to the Atari lineup, but honestly it just makes Atgames look desperate. 40 Genesis games is IMO better than 40 genesis games + 40 toilet cloggers. Nintendo NES Classic Mini only has 30 games, at least for it's first incarnation (I am sure Nintendo is leaving titles on the table for future reissues), but those games are above and beyond what the Sega and Atari flashbacks are offering. Yeah there's the Sonic games, but just how much of that Sega library are AAA titles? Do gamers really need all three Mortal Kombats? One of them would be sufficient. Also if parents are getting these for their children, they might object to their kids playing MK, not that there's far worse out there. I think the flashback plug-n-plays are exempt from ESRB ratings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I don't know why the 'extra' games get so much flak- who doesn't love Mr. Balls and Yawning Triceratops? You can add whatever Genesis games you want- just use the cartridge port (or SD on the portable). Anything extra is games you won't get elsewhere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kosmic, I know.

 

I think the flashback plug-n-plays are exempt from ESRB ratings?

 

It would appear to be optional.

 

For instance, the Atari Flashback 2 carried a ESRB rating. But AtGames doesn't seem to ever go down that route. So it wouldn't appear to be something that retailers mandate for such products, with it left up to the publisher to decide if the benefits are worth the investment.

Edited by Atariboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, everything across the line hardware-wise is going to be addressed in 2017, so no worries there (although AtGames was well aware of the criticisms about the Sega hardware and planning to address them finally anyway, the vitriolic articles today repeating the same talking points and going semi-viral are particularly cutting since it's so difficult to get press otherwise). And yes, there have been discussions about dropping the 40 "bonus" games. They really aren't necessary in my opinion either, although I will admit to liking a few of them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to admit that I never tried more than 3 or 4 of the bonus games, so I'm just doing the old repeating the same thing that everyone else says routine. Bad habit to get into...

 

So needless to say, that wasn't exactly fair to condemn the entire lineup as wasted space.

Edited by Atariboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to admit that I never tried more than 3 or 4 of the bonus games, so I'm just doing the old repeating the same thing that everyone else says routine. Bad habit to get into...

 

So needless to say, that wasn't exactly fair to condemn the entire lineup as wasted space.

 

For the heck of it, you should try a few more. For me, the biggest issue with the games is not that most of them clone or copy gameplay from other games, but that they lack that final bit of polish that even good homebrews have. Of course, there are some real turkeys in there, polish or not.

 

One that I enjoy that I really have no right to is "Panic Lift." It's about as simple and silly a concept as there is and is reminiscent of an average Flash game, but I nevertheless have fun with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I'll finally get a new version of one of these (I have the orange 2008 one) and give the extra game a try. I would prefer to wait until the sound is fixed, though.

 

Can you shed any light into the decision making process for including these? Seems they'd be a better fit for the Atari portable if they're old-fashioned type games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I'll finally get a new version of one of these (I have the orange 2008 one) and give the extra game a try. I would prefer to wait until the sound is fixed, though.

 

Can you shed any light into the decision making process for including these? Seems they'd be a better fit for the Atari portable if they're old-fashioned type games.

 

Just a way to add more value in terms of volume of games. It's difficult to grow the libraries, although things look better for next year.

 

If you get a good deal, there would be no particular reason not to get one this year, although waiting just a bit longer (relatively speaking) and it should be improved in multiple areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, as did I, but the list of games on the British version (likely similar or identical to the American one) is everywhere in stories like this.

http://thenextweb.com/gadgets/2016/07/25/987741/#gref

 

That list of games is accurate. However, the press release doesn't go into the games. It only talks about the four systems and key features. The game reveals will be for future press releases.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, everything across the line hardware-wise is going to be addressed in 2017, so no worries there (although AtGames was well aware of the criticisms about the Sega hardware and planning to address them finally anyway, the vitriolic articles today repeating the same talking points and going semi-viral are particularly cutting since it's so difficult to get press otherwise). And yes, there have been discussions about dropping the 40 "bonus" games. They really aren't necessary in my opinion either, although I will admit to liking a few of them.

 

From what I understand, aren't the filler games made by Tec Toy and where available on multi-carts in South America because of the licensing with SEGA? If that's truely the case, I would love to see Tec Toy's Genesis port of Duke Nukem make a appearance. If you haven't seen it yet, it's very impressive what they where able to accomplish on stock Genesis hardware and could really be a selling point to casuals as well as collectors due to the rarity of that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

From what I understand, aren't the filler games made by Tec Toy and where available on multi-carts in South America because of the licensing with SEGA? If that's truely the case, I would love to see Tec Toy's Genesis port of Duke Nukem make a appearance. If you haven't seen it yet, it's very impressive what they where able to accomplish on stock Genesis hardware and could really be a selling point to casuals as well as collectors due to the rarity of that game.

 

Actually, these games are specific to the AtGames hardware and don't work on a real Genesis. They're Genesis-like in general audio-visual fidelity, but not compatible.

 

We've discussed licensing Duke Nukem and a few other games from that rights holder in the past, but nothing was ever agreed upon between the various parties. It doesn't mean it won't ever happen, but it's not something imminent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, the press release went out today: http://armchairarcade.com/perspectives/2016/07/27/press-release-atgames-release-latest-generation-atari-flashback-genesis-classic-game-console-products/

 

I'm not going to spam the rest of the threads with it.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill,

 

So does the Atari Flashback Portable have an SD cart slot? There was no mention in the press release.

 

 

 

It was in the copy I provided to them. I don't know why they omitted it. Yes, that feature is there. Seems crazy not to mention it.

 

They don't mention the SD card slot in the Sega Genesis portable, either. That's been included since the very first one. I would assume that leaving out that little detail was deliberate. Maybe it's confusing to have it only on the portables, not on the TV consoles. Maybe they don't want to deal with questions about ROMs before the thing even goes on sale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

They don't mention the SD card slot in the Sega Genesis portable, either. That's been included since the very first one. I would assume that leaving out that little detail was deliberate. Maybe it's confusing to have it only on the portables, not on the TV consoles. Maybe they don't want to deal with questions about ROMs before the thing even goes on sale.

 

 

OK, I received word back. The omission was intentional due to the nature of SD cards (as you speculate). Those features are still present, of course.

 

If it were up to me I would have mentioned it, but no reason to anger any partners I suppose.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

OK, I received word back. The omission was intentional due to the nature of SD cards (as you speculate). Those features are still present, of course.

 

If it were up to me I would have mentioned it, but no reason to anger any partners I suppose.

Is this a case of "it's easier to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission"?

In the end mentioned or not the feature is there. If it is the feature that angers the partners, not mentioning it would anger them even more .... or do I NOT understand how these things work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this a case of "it's easier to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission"?

In the end mentioned or not the feature is there. If it is the feature that angers the partners, not mentioning it would anger them even more .... or do I NOT understand how this things work?

 

I think it's more like "don't bite the hand that feeds you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...